Talk:Positive psychology

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Mandarax (talk) 19:16, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
Sorry. The article started at 20942 prose characters, so a five times expansion is not really possible. If you get the article to GA status, feel free to resubmit within a week of that designation.

(

• Comment or view
• Article history

)

• ... that the UN publishes an annual World Happiness Report that ranks countries across the world based on how happy their citizens are? Source: The UN has been doing this since 2012
  • ALT1:...and that the results for 2020 are in, and they include rankings of cities as well? Source: You can see where your country and city land on the official World Happiness Report for 2020 here!

Created/expanded by Eljia7 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC).

• : This article is not eligible for DYK, as it has not been expanded 5 fold and it was created in 2003. It was expaneded by Eljia7 about two-fold over the last few days. While your work is greatly appreciated, it would be a Herculean task to expand it to a size large enough to be nominated for DYK in the next few days. Footlessmouse (talk) 22:22, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 7 May 2024 and 12 August 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Michellevp16 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Allysch, MaddiMcg, Sawyerbrady44, AngelOffley, Cjaneellen.

— Assignment last updated by Makylam18 (talk) 10:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: Psychology Capstone

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2024 and 6 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Victoriaduncan1 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Smithme2, Seeaton, Lillysparks2, Joblanston, AnishaY673, Sheridandvis81.

— Assignment last updated by Rahneli (talk) 21:49, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Positive relationships

Greetings everyone,

I'm quite a new editor, hence why I opted to post here before adding something to the page. I'm quite surprised almost nothing is said about positive relationships. In short, I wanted to add something about: process of capitalization, approach commitment and avoidance commitment, gratitude in relationships, responsiveness, and (research of) interventions.

Would this be useful to add? Should I make a draft for these topics here, or just add them to the article and see how it's received? If so, where should I put them? Foolish Editor (talk) 20:41, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Revisit First Paragraph

Currently the first paragraph of the article is:

Positive psychology is a field of psychological theory and research of optimal human functioning of people, groups, and institutions. It studies "positive subjective experience, positive individual traits, and positive institutions... it aims to improve quality of life."

Let me explain why I think this is a problematic first paragraph.

First: "Positive psychology is a field of psychological theory and research of optimal human functioning of people, groups, and institutions." The term "optimal human functioning" is too vague—what exactly about human functioning are we optimizing? Does positive psychology literature ever claim they want to optimize anything?

Second part: "It studies "positive subjective experience, positive individual traits, and positive institutions... it aims to improve quality of life."” Which based on content is fine to me, the … in the middle of the sentence (sentence doesn't flow well) and usage of quotation marks (what/who is being quoted?) seems unnecessary though.

I would vote to use the definition the APA uses for positive psychology - would love to hear your thoughts on this! Foolish Editor (talk) 21:30, 3 January 2025 (UTC)